Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor is_bot_user function to improve actor type handling #1359

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Nov 14, 2024

User description

fixes #1356


PR Type

enhancement, bug fix


Description

  • Refactored the is_bot_user function to improve handling of Bitbucket actor types by using the get method for safer dictionary access.
  • Enhanced logic to allow only 'user' actor types, treating 'AppUser' and 'team' as bot users.
  • Improved logging to provide clearer information when the actor type is not 'user'.
  • Fixed error message formatting in exception handling to correctly display exceptions.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
bitbucket_app.py
Refactor and fix actor type handling in `is_bot_user` function

pr_agent/servers/bitbucket_app.py

  • Refactored is_bot_user function to improve handling of actor types.
  • Changed logic to check actor type using get method for safer access.
  • Improved logging for non-user actor types.
  • Fixed error message formatting in exception handling.
  • +6/-3     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Nov 14, 2024

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    (Review updated until commit fe27f96)

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    🎫 Ticket compliance analysis ✅

    1356 - Fully compliant

    Compliant requirements:

    • Fix 'data' field missing error by using safe dictionary access with get()
    • Fix is_bot_user function validation by improving payload structure handling
    • Fix Bitbucket webhook payload handling with better error handling and logging
    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 95
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Edge Case
    The allowed_actor_types set contains only 'user'. Consider if there are other valid actor types that should be allowed.

    Error Handling
    Multiple nested try-except blocks for username extraction could be simplified using a more streamlined approach

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Nov 14, 2024

    /review

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Persistent review updated to latest commit 2c3aa7b

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Nov 14, 2024

    /improve

    Copy link
    Contributor

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot commented Nov 14, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Latest suggestions up to fe27f96

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Return True on exceptions in bot detection to prevent potential security bypass

    The error handling in is_bot_user function will always return False when an
    exception occurs, potentially allowing bot users through. Consider returning True on
    exceptions for safer handling.

    pr_agent/servers/bitbucket_app.py [100-109]

     try:
         actor = data.get("data", {}).get("actor", {})
         allowed_actor_types = {"user"}
         if actor and actor["type"].lower() not in allowed_actor_types:
             get_logger().info(f"BitBucket actor type is not 'user', skipping: {actor}")
             return True
     except Exception as e:
         get_logger().error(f"Failed 'is_bot_user' logic: {e}")
    +    return True
     return False
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: This is a critical security suggestion that prevents potential bot access in error cases. The current implementation could allow bots to bypass restrictions when exceptions occur.

    9
    Possible issue
    Use safe dictionary access to prevent potential runtime errors

    The actor dictionary access for type checking should use .get() to avoid potential
    KeyError if 'type' key is missing.

    pr_agent/servers/bitbucket_app.py [104]

    -if actor and actor["type"].lower() not in allowed_actor_types:
    +if actor and actor.get("type", "").lower() not in allowed_actor_types:
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Using .get() instead of direct dictionary access is a good defensive programming practice that prevents KeyError exceptions and makes the code more robust.

    7
    General
    Simplify nested error handling with a more robust fallback chain

    The nested try-except blocks for username extraction could lead to unclear error
    handling. Consider using get() with a default value.

    pr_agent/servers/bitbucket_app.py [169-175]

    -try:
    -    username = actor["username"]
    -except KeyError:
    -    try:
    -        username = actor["display_name"]
    -    except KeyError:
    -        username = actor["nickname"]
    +username = actor.get("username") or actor.get("display_name") or actor.get("nickname", "unknown")
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion simplifies complex nested try-except blocks into a more readable and maintainable chain of fallbacks, while preserving the same functionality.

    6
    • Author self-review: I have reviewed the PR code suggestions, and addressed the relevant ones.

    Previous suggestions

    Suggestions up to commit c934523
    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Fix incorrect bot user detection by returning False instead of falling through to default return value when exceptions occur

    The function returns True for bot users but also when there's an exception, which
    could lead to incorrectly identifying human users as bots. Return False for
    exceptions to avoid false positives.

    pr_agent/servers/bitbucket_app.py [100-109]

     try:
         actor = data.get("data", {}).get("actor", {})
         allowed_actor_types = {"user"}
         if actor and actor["type"].lower() not in allowed_actor_types:
             get_logger().info(f"BitBucket actor type is not 'user', skipping: {actor}")
             return True
    +    return False
     except Exception as e:
         get_logger().error(f"Failed 'is_bot_user' logic: {e}")
    -return False
    +    return False
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a logical flaw where exceptions in bot detection could lead to false negatives. Moving the return False inside the try block and keeping it after exceptions improves the function's reliability and error handling.

    8
    Prevent potential KeyError by using safe dictionary access method

    Direct dictionary access to actor["type"] can raise KeyError if type key is missing.
    Use get() method for safer access.

    pr_agent/servers/bitbucket_app.py [104]

    -if actor and actor["type"].lower() not in allowed_actor_types:
    +if actor and actor.get("type", "").lower() not in allowed_actor_types:
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion addresses a potential runtime error by using the safer get() method for dictionary access, which is particularly important when dealing with external API responses that might have varying structures.

    7

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit cd8ba4f into main Nov 14, 2024
    2 checks passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/is_bot_user branch November 14, 2024 06:29
    @okotek
    Copy link
    Contributor

    okotek commented Nov 24, 2024

    /review

    Persistent review updated to latest commit fe27f96

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    Bitbucket Webhook Fails to Handle Payload - Missing Field 'data'
    3 participants