refactor: ♻️ Refactor dictionary comprehension for generating report

[Anselmoo]

All PR-Submissions:

---

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open
  Pull Requests for the same
  update/change?

New ✨✨ Feature-Submissions:

---

• Does your submission pass tests?
• Have you lint your code locally prior to submission? Fixed:
• This PR is for a new feature, not a bug fix.

Changes to ⚙️ Core-Features:

---

• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like
  us to include them?
• Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
• Have you successfully run tests with your changes locally?

Summary by Sourcery

Refactor the report generation function to use dictionary comprehension, enhancing code readability and maintainability.

Enhancements:

• Refactor dictionary comprehension in the report generation function to improve code readability and maintainability.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 1 of 1 files.

Overall, the semantic diff is 32% smaller than the GitHub diff.

	Filename	Status
✔️	spectrafit/report.py	31.34% smaller

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request refactors the generate_report method in the spectrafit/report.py file. The main change is the use of a dictionary comprehension to initialize the report dictionary, replacing the previous approach of initializing an empty dictionary and then adding key-value pairs.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Refactored the initialization of the 'report' dictionary using a dictionary comprehension	Replaced the empty dictionary initialization and subsequent assignments with a single dictionary comprehension Moved the 'Fit Statistics' and 'Variables and Values' assignments into the dictionary comprehension Kept the conditional assignment of 'Correlations of Components' outside the dictionary comprehension	spectrafit/report.py

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @Anselmoo - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (cd9c6ce) to head (bf9c347).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1600   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           44        44           
  Lines         4466      4464    -2     
=========================================
- Hits          4466      4464    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
spectrafit/report.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)