-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bibxml citation library #1173
Comments
@Flowdalic that seems doable. We also maintain(ed) a zipfile and tarfile of all the individual bibxml files, however I'm not sure if the IETF needs those. @rjsparks can clarify for us but I know he is very busy this week with the IETF meeting. |
To my knowledge we have not used a zip or tarball of the files.
If those URLs stop working, and anyone tries to pick up a draft like that and edit from it, they will have a bad time. |
As pointed out by nav in the jdev MUC I am bit concerned that the links are not versioned, given that XEPs are living documents, a reference to XEP-0123 could become a reference to a more-or-less different XEP in the future. Maybe it would be better if XEPs where referenced by version, e.g., http://xmpp.org/extensions/refs/reference.XSF.XEP-0124-v1.0.xml. But of course, this has other drawbacks. |
IETF specifications often contain references to living standards (e.g., HTML); this is fine and usually preferred. If it is necessary for a spec to cite a specific version of another standard, that can be worked out manually. Thus I suggest that one citation file per specification is best. |
FWIW, our references under https://xmpp.org/extensions/refs/ are now up to date and regularly generated. I've also created ietf-tools/bibxml-service#302 |
For many years we have maintained a citation library in bibxml format for use in the references section of Internet-Drafts and other non-XSF specifications. The main consumer of this citation library is the IETF, which plans to restrict the number of domains from which it pulls bibxml files. We need to decide whether we want the XSF to be on the shortlist.
Here are a few considerations:
FWIW, my tentative recommendation is that we not keep maintaining the citation library.
cc @rjsparks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: