You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Adding a watcher for each (named) object in spec.syncItems would allow Espejo to update/recreate an object immediately upon changes. On accidential deletions they would be recreated/reconciled. This would also remove the need to regularly reconcile for nothing (when no object changed)
Questions:
Performance: Is it feasible to add a watcher for each object? Does it consume much memory/CPU compared to reconciling regularly? Do we generally watch the Kind of object and filter by name?
Link: How do we link an update event back to a specific SyncConfig? Labels, Annotations, OwnerReference?
What if multiple SyncConfigs manage the same set of Objects? Will there be a loop, how can it be broken?
This discussion was converted from issue #38 on October 12, 2021 12:51.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Adding a watcher for each (named) object in
spec.syncItems
would allow Espejo to update/recreate an object immediately upon changes. On accidential deletions they would be recreated/reconciled. This would also remove the need to regularly reconcile for nothing (when no object changed)Questions:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions