You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
thanks for the plugin.
If I understand well, a larger contrast range should give more or longer ridges. Because larger variation of contrast is tolerated. By the way it does not seem to be so in the screenshots that I attach: one with the range 0-230 and the other with 200-230.
So what would be the correlation between the (number or length of the) fibers and the low and high contrast chosen?
All the best,
Asef
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Asef67
changed the title
Correlation between contrast range and the number of detected ridges
Correlation between contrast range and the number (and or the length) of detected ridges
Jun 26, 2018
Hello,
thanks for the plugin.
If I understand well, a larger contrast range should give more or longer ridges. Because larger variation of contrast is tolerated. By the way it does not seem to be so in the screenshots that I attach: one with the range 0-230 and the other with 200-230.
So what would be the correlation between the (number or length of the) fibers and the low and high contrast chosen?
All the best,
Asef
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: