Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correlation between contrast range and the number (and or the length) of detected ridges #32

Open
Asef67 opened this issue Jun 26, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@Asef67
Copy link

Asef67 commented Jun 26, 2018

Hello,
thanks for the plugin.
If I understand well, a larger contrast range should give more or longer ridges. Because larger variation of contrast is tolerated. By the way it does not seem to be so in the screenshots that I attach: one with the range 0-230 and the other with 200-230.
So what would be the correlation between the (number or length of the) fibers and the low and high contrast chosen?
All the best,
Asef

200-230
0-230

@Asef67 Asef67 changed the title Correlation between contrast range and the number of detected ridges Correlation between contrast range and the number (and or the length) of detected ridges Jun 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant