You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think you have a great point in your article that quotes might be better to evaluate Google search results. It really falls under the larger question "How else can we assess Gorilla betas?" It's expected that cloud vendors will publically say they support all three: they want to maximize their compute workloads and never give anyone a reason to pick a competitor over them. None of them win publicly by admitting that they prefer or prioritize one format over another (different from Snowflake and Databricks, who are trying to duke it out).
Some other ways to evaluate investment priorities that might be useful to look at:
Relative number and types of contributions to each project
Breadth of support for read and write amongst different technologies
Committership and/or PMC membership to one or more projects.
PS: I updated your title to be less inflammatory. The best thing we can do for the community is to minimize rhetoric.
The google search results queries should use quotes to better represent Gorilla bets. More thoughts here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: