You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 27, 2024. It is now read-only.
Search is currently rather confusing if you not know how the algorithm works.
E.g. being broader results in less results.
Berlin --> 1 Result because one exact match.
Helmholzkiez --> 8 Result because fallback shows all results.
Bergmannkiez and Boxhagner Kiez --> Same result.
My suggestion: Grouping them in two result groups
A. Returns exact match in a specific area (e.g. Berlin or Helmholzkietz)
B. If (A) has very few results we additionally provide a List of shops, sorted by distance to (A).
Maybe we only need B if A < 5 Results
In the frontend we will need a visual differentiation between (A) and (B).
"We found 3 shops in Helmholzkietz but 5 other shops might be interesting to you."
I think this would be a more relatable experience for the customer.
Hey @Lebski, I only found this issue two days ago. Notification were messed up, I guess. We need to figure out a way to get a better overview. 😅 About the issue itself: Absolutely valid points.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Search is currently rather confusing if you not know how the algorithm works.
E.g. being broader results in less results.
Berlin --> 1 Result because one exact match.
Helmholzkiez --> 8 Result because fallback shows all results.
Bergmannkiez and Boxhagner Kiez --> Same result.
My suggestion: Grouping them in two result groups
A. Returns exact match in a specific area (e.g. Berlin or Helmholzkietz)
B. If (A) has very few results we additionally provide a List of shops, sorted by distance to (A).
Maybe we only need B if A < 5 Results
In the frontend we will need a visual differentiation between (A) and (B).
"We found 3 shops in Helmholzkietz but 5 other shops might be interesting to you."
I think this would be a more relatable experience for the customer.
@cnasenberg @schugnic
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: