-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 260
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added documentation for bulk entity extension #1543
Merged
+36
−1
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we encourage the usage of the constants? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see what you mean. I would document it in this way because Entities via Attributes or custom entities don't have such constants and the constant is also no "official" requirement right?
It also refer to the "definition" again, something which might be obsolete in the future
Therefore i would recommend to show it in this way i guess.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@OliverSkroblin yes and the entities via attributes are a hell without these constants! I will provide a fix soon, that allows using the AttributeEntity::class as reference. This is such a mess as this will hold us back from using it the Doctrine ORM way.
It was really difficult to find out how to extend an attribute entity >:(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is that such a hassle? You can simply reference the table name. You don’t always have to use constants everywhere ;).
If this is important for all of you, i would recommend to add a class constant again. I would always go the way of using a simple string which make it much more readable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fun thing. I would always go for the PHP symbol so I can ensure the "magic string" is stored on a symbol, that is affected by refactorings correctly. This helps to understand by just looking at the uses what my real-life dependencies are. I see the benefit in the simplicity at time of writing, not at time of maintaining.