-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Developer documentation on how to profile for performance #764
Comments
@Czaki suggested adding to Scientific Python instead of creating new docs for SpatialData. A plan now would be adding a paragraph in https://spatialdata.scverse.org/en/stable/contributing.html: linking to https://lectures.scientific-python.org/advanced/debugging/index.html, some links from above and https://napari.org/stable/developers/contributing/performance/index.html. |
Also Profiling section of this classes https://gitlab.mimuw.edu.pl/python-tools/debugger From scientific python, the https://lectures.scientific-python.org/advanced/optimizing/index.html#profiling-python-code fits better. The main question is if spatialdata should have own document about performance, or we should try to convince wider community (ex. scientific python) to have one place to store all generic information about performance monitoring in one place. There are 3 main profilers vmprof, yappi, cProfile. There is memray from Bloomberg to trace memory https://github.com/bloomberg/memray |
The PR has the two links to the Scientific Python pages, both debugging and profiling. I think this is good enough for the SpatialData docs for now. We can consider adding a very specific profiling example with SpatialData later maybe. For profiling in general, we can consider extending the lecture-style docs at https://lectures.scientific-python.org/advanced with your debugging examples and updating the tooling section. We can also add an extra developer guide of profiling at https://github.com/scientific-python/cookie/tree/main/docs (although this is somewhat linked to their cookie-cutter and sp-repo-review project) |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In the contributing guide, there is currently no section on benchmarking or optimizing code.
Describe the solution you'd like
The contributing guide should be extended with information on how to profile locally, writing a performance bug report and how to profile a new PR for performance.
Describe alternatives you've considered
There is a lot of existing material we can use or link to:
Additional context
Having a regression testing framework is linked to this, but out-of-scope.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: