-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optional automerge action for scala-steward PRs #39
Comments
It's definitely doable, I'm just not sure it belongs here. Doesn't mergify meet the criteria? I haven't actually played with it too much. |
I'm not sure either. But it's definitely something that a lot of Scala libraries could benefit from and save some precious maintainer time. Depends on the goals of this plugin. |
@djspiewak how do you regenerate the test files? |
One issue I see with mergify is that apparently you have to specify every matrix permutation like this: https://github.com/http4s/http4s/blob/main/.mergify.yml Since the job name includes the minor scala version, this means the mergify file will get invalidated quite often. Is there a way to make the job names less specific? |
I opened a PR with https://github.com/marketplace/actions/merge-me which is a GitHub action unlike Mergify |
Is it possible to use wildcards in the matrix definition? I see some above in the labels. |
This is happening in typelevel/sbt-typelevel#190 |
You could have just used sbt-mergify-github-actions from https://github.com/nafg/mergify-yaml/. I mentioned it above |
I think sbt-typelevel solves the issue you mentioned about the matrix |
As does my library |
Would there be interest in adding an optional automerge action for scala-steward?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: