Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

While defining streams for NAT, instead of specifying each stream in blaster file, step can be introduced #253

Open
ArunPrakashThangaraj opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request low Low priority

Comments

@ArunPrakashThangaraj
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

While preparing the blaster file for multiple NAT streams (say 100 streams with different source-port), I need to include 100 streams in the blaster file manually. Instead, if we have total streams, step, starting source-port, the file looks much simpler.

Describe the solution you'd like
In the following stream-group-id 1, I have 100 streams and the only difference is the source-port. Instead of mentioning each stream here, we can simplify it by having, source-port-start, total-port, step
{
"name": "TCPSTREAM1",
"stream-group-id": 1,
"type": "ipv4",
"direction": "both",
"vlan-priority": 1,
"raw-tcp": true,
"source-port": 65001,
"length": 100,
"nat": true,
"pps": 0.3
},
{
"name": "TCPSTREAM2",
"stream-group-id": 1,
"type": "ipv4",
"direction": "both",
"vlan-priority": 1,
"raw-tcp": true,
"source-port": 65002,
"length": 100,
"nat": true,
"pps": 0.3
},
{
"name": "TCPSTREAM3",
"stream-group-id": 1,
"type": "ipv4",
"direction": "both",
"vlan-priority": 1,
"raw-tcp": true,
"source-port": 65003,
"length": 100,
"nat": true,
"pps": 0.3
},

Describe alternatives you've considered

A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@ArunPrakashThangaraj ArunPrakashThangaraj added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 17, 2024
@GIC-de GIC-de added the low Low priority label Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request low Low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants