Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

We need media/reporter/newspaper support #1772

Open
shenlebantongying opened this issue Mar 25, 2021 · 40 comments
Open

We need media/reporter/newspaper support #1772

shenlebantongying opened this issue Mar 25, 2021 · 40 comments

Comments

@shenlebantongying
Copy link
Collaborator

shenlebantongying commented Mar 25, 2021

There are so many evil people spreading misinformation and hiding half of the story. Opportunities are sneaking in to steal the outcome of free software movement. They want to destroy FSF for their own good.

We know RMS might have some personality problem. However, as a diverse community, we should not censor someone completely. A lot of his work is the foundation of the whole movement.

RMS go or not, free software movement would be damaged. General public would think this movement was founded by some absurd man. His writings about the spirit of freedom will be forgotten. Also, the action of "cancel someone" may also seed a hidden bomb on the free software community in the long run.


If you google Richard Stallman now, a lot of horrible news on RMS will show up, including that rms-open-letter which contains a creepy appendix.

For example: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/03/free-software-advocates-seek-removal-of-richard-stallman-and-entire-fsf-board/

Organizations from rms-open-letter can spread the words through their official channel, but we cannot do that. It's a big disadvantage.

We have almost the same number of people signed now (and more stars than them). We should let the outside world know the good side of RMS, FSF and more broadly the free software movement.

If anyone can help us to spread the positive words over media to general public, please help.


Examples of medias supporting us:

Examples of medias that are neural

Examples of medias that doesn't ignore our existence

Examples of independent medias

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Mar 25, 2021

I'm honestly weirded out organizations like EFF and Mozilla are against Richard publicly. Maybe I am missing some part of the argument, but right now it looks like large enough organizations with financial ties hurting a person who had helped everyone with his projects. I doubt there are many Wi-Fi routers compiled without GCC or Linux machines using only Clang/LLVM.

@nukeop
Copy link
Member

nukeop commented Mar 25, 2021

"Organizations" don't sign letters, people do.

Note that most of these organizations signed by email, which is completely unverifiable as to whether it's their official stance, or whether they really did it, because those emails were never published and there are no PGP signatures. At best, the letter was signed by some people within those organizations who claim to represent every member, but that's obviously false since some members of these organizations signed out letter.

@nukeop nukeop pinned this issue Mar 25, 2021
@shenlebantongying shenlebantongying changed the title We need media/reporter/newpaper support We need media/reporter/newspaper support Mar 25, 2021
@majkinetor
Copy link
Contributor

majkinetor commented Mar 25, 2021

@romanrm
Copy link
Contributor

romanrm commented Mar 25, 2021

@nukeop did you send a link to the letter website to RMS himself? Was there a reply, if any? And to the FSF? Thanks

@shenlebantongying
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@romanrm You may want to check this
https://www.fsf.org/news/preliminary-board-statement-on-fsf-governance

@shenlebantongying
Copy link
Collaborator Author

shenlebantongying commented Mar 26, 2021

SUSE and RedHat just made official statements :(

https://twitter.com/RedHat/status/1375190874011865088
https://twitter.com/SUSE/status/1375080950024011779

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Mar 26, 2021

SUSE and RedHat just made official statements :(

And at least RedHat's one is absurd. Just listen to Bryan Lunduke's comments: Red Hat attacks Stallman

@sertraline
Copy link
Contributor

Just sharing an interesting read (@cmpunches): https://web.archive.org/web/20210326090023/https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/issues/2250

The issue has been deleted from their repo.
Original issue: https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io/issues/2250

@gorshunovr
Copy link
Contributor

Petition: Journalists to stop the persecution of Stallman and apologize publicly

Could it be added to README?

@DOORAK
Copy link

DOORAK commented Mar 27, 2021

"Microsoft-Connected (and Funded) Sites Still Distort What Happened and What Richard Stallman Actually Said"
http://techrights.org/2021/03/23/still-libeling-rms/

@AnimusPEXUS
Copy link
Contributor

AnimusPEXUS commented Mar 27, 2021

Screenshot from 2021-03-27 17-56-36_2

@podvornyakva
Copy link
Contributor

podvornyakva commented Mar 27, 2021

SUSE and RedHat just made official statements

Still nothing on those sites? What a shame. Is there a competent web developer to solve that issue?

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Mar 27, 2021

Thank you very much, @AnimusPEXUS

@purplesyringa purplesyringa unpinned this issue Mar 27, 2021
@shenlebantongying
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Open is Cancelled : https://medium.com/@beewithablog/open-is-cancelled-da7dd6f2aaaf

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Mar 28, 2021

I don't understand the big idea behind "ethical licensing". They give you source if you promise to be kind? Or an executable? Will they add means to retract software from the user?

The underlying theory is flawed and shallow

Hell no, sharing is caring

It’s time to build a new movement, one fit for an era of rising fascism and climate justice

I'm really, really concerned about this sentence

@podvornyakva
Copy link
Contributor

podvornyakva commented Mar 28, 2021

climax justice.. hmm.. sounds useful. =))

@sertraline
Copy link
Contributor

JUSTICE, not FREEDOM, is what I want from software.

I guess that sentence says it all.

@nukeop
Copy link
Member

nukeop commented Mar 28, 2021

This redefines "justice' to mean "aligning with my political ideology". Stallman was dozens of steps ahead of such people even 40 years ago.

@sertraline
Copy link
Contributor

This redefines "justice' to mean "aligning with my political ideology". Stallman was dozens of steps ahead of such people even 40 years ago.

Indeed, what people like those want is to create a modern cast system not based on what you do, but based on what you are (a man, a woman, a nationality, race, a worldview you hold, a group you belong to). Which is why they want to seize already populated movement rather than creating their own. Talking about "dismantling power structures" while walking along with companies and corporations, and encouraging oppression against wrongthink. Talking about security above freedom. Their hypocrisy is well hidden as they keep talking in abstract concepts and small morality based accusations which are vague and hard to grasp, with no concept of "innocent until proven guilty".

Software doesn't matter to them, neither does freedom, neither does "open". Any means of power for multiplying division among people, however, do.

@AnimusPEXUS
Copy link
Contributor

we all know, what deserve those, who trade their freedom for justice

@shenlebantongying shenlebantongying pinned this issue Mar 28, 2021
@kchanqvq
Copy link
Contributor

This redefines "justice' to mean "aligning with my political ideology". Stallman was dozens of steps ahead of such people even 40 years ago.

Indeed, what people like those want is to create a modern cast system not based on what you do, but based on what you are (a man, a woman, a nationality, race, a worldview you hold, a group you belong to). Which is why they want to seize already populated movement rather than creating their own. Talking about "dismantling power structures" while walking along with companies and corporations, and encouraging oppression against wrongthink. Talking about security above freedom. Their hypocrisy is well hidden as they keep talking in abstract concepts and small morality based accusations which are vague and hard to grasp, with no concept of "innocent until proven guilty".

Software doesn't matter to them, neither does freedom, neither does "open". Any means of power for multiplying division among people, however, do.

It scares me how much this resembles Cultural Revolution.

@franpoli
Copy link
Contributor

franpoli commented Mar 29, 2021

Linux Action News and their special guest Neil McGovern released yesterday an episode mentioning the two letters. No debate here, you'll guess the outcome.

Linux Action News is not oriented GNU - free softwares. It is sponsored by Digital Ocean. Gnome si sponsored by Google, Amazon RedHat and Ditgital Ocean among others, just to give you an idea about the affiliations here.

@cmpunches
Copy link
Contributor

cmpunches commented Mar 29, 2021

Neil MCGovern: Gnome Foundation and Debian
Molly de Blanc: Gnome Foundation and Debian
Elana Hashman: Debian -- who also played a critical role in facilitating the smear campaign.

@cmpunches
Copy link
Contributor

Linux Action News and their special guest Neil McGovern released yesterday an episode mentioning the two letters. No debate here, you'll guess the outcome.

Linux Action News is not oriented GNU - free softwares. It is sponsored by Digital Ocean. Gnome si sponsored by Google, Amazon RedHat and Ditgital Ocean among others, just to give you an idea about the affiliations here.

That certainly explains some things too. This needs promotion. They won't make direct statements, they're working proxies.

@franpoli
Copy link
Contributor

FSFE has also launched a smear campaign. This organization, which claims to be independent, does not want the FSF to be so. Ironically, FSFE owes its independence to Google for the most of it.

@Aspie96
Copy link
Contributor

Aspie96 commented Mar 31, 2021

It'd be nice if ESR published an article about it.

Or if we had the signature of Distro Tube...

@romanrm
Copy link
Contributor

romanrm commented Mar 31, 2021

Please upvote this if you have a Slashdot account: https://slashdot.org/submission/13536574/libreboot-others-form-a-campaign-to-defend-richard-stallman
Or sign up and upvote if you hadn't. :)

@pastk
Copy link
Contributor

pastk commented Apr 4, 2021

There is a pro-RMS article in russian on https://www.cnews.ru/news/top/2021-03-24_razvernuta_bespretsedentnaya
However they misrepresented his statements on Epstein case, like he was defending Epstein, doh....
I sent them a detailed email, I hope they'll fix it.

@romanrm
Copy link
Contributor

romanrm commented Apr 5, 2021

Someone made a website: https://stallmansupport.org/
Share and repost!

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Apr 5, 2021

Share and repost!

I will, thank you.

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Apr 5, 2021

like he was defending Epstein, doh....

Uh-oh, a new vector for misinterpretation.

I sent them a detailed email, I hope they'll fix it.

Thank you.

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Apr 6, 2021

@Aspie96 , can you try to contact him. He reviewed the situation already and did a good job, but it'd be nice.

https://www.distrotube.com/contact/

@Aspie96
Copy link
Contributor

Aspie96 commented Apr 6, 2021

I am not his follower.

I think it'd be better if someone who follows every of his video writes him.

@Aspie96
Copy link
Contributor

Aspie96 commented Apr 9, 2021

@Aspie96
Copy link
Contributor

Aspie96 commented Apr 14, 2021

FSF India statement
https://fsf.org.in/news/board-statement-2021/

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Apr 14, 2021

FSF India statement

All this talk about "improving governance processes", though... Hopefully it doesn't improve for the interests of the corporate overlords.

@Aspie96
Copy link
Contributor

Aspie96 commented Apr 14, 2021

But it does have space for improvement IMHO.

Either way it's good that FSF India defends RMS.

@Aspie96
Copy link
Contributor

Aspie96 commented Apr 14, 2021

@6r1d
Copy link
Member

6r1d commented Apr 14, 2021

r/gnu is biased

They sure are, they remove all the support letter stuff, they removed my own post, showing that the support letter exists.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gnu/comments/mdbe09/a_support_letter_for_richard_stallman/

@Aspie96
Copy link
Contributor

Aspie96 commented Apr 14, 2021

The bias is even more obvious here because they did allow the other statement

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests