-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Related issues with pin nodes #133
Comments
|
|
I have moved all the nodes to be optional. |
Please let me know if there is more issues related nodes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'm opening this as a single issue; all of this is tightly bound up together.
1. "Pin node" is not a standard Kubernetes/OpenShift term. "Node selector" would be a better term, as that's what it is.2. It should not be necessary to assign the benchmark operator pod to a node selector; let the scheduler take care of that.
3. It shouldn't really be necessary to assign the workload to a node selector. For cases where it matters, it should be optional.
4. For workloads that should run on different nodes, pod anti-affinity would be a better construct and could be applied by the operator itself (I suspect it already does).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: