You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the solve_lmde_perturbation function requires that the labels for the perturbations be non-negative integers. It would be nice to allow more general labels, e.g. strings that can directly name what the perturbation represents.
This could either be done by having a translation of arbitrary labels <-> integers before/after the core of the function is executed, or by modifying the actual internals to work with more general labels. The latter would be more elegant, though it'll likely be much easier to do the former. (I can't recall how much of the internals make use of integer properties.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the expected behavior?
Currently the
solve_lmde_perturbation
function requires that the labels for the perturbations be non-negative integers. It would be nice to allow more general labels, e.g. strings that can directly name what the perturbation represents.This could either be done by having a translation of arbitrary labels <-> integers before/after the core of the function is executed, or by modifying the actual internals to work with more general labels. The latter would be more elegant, though it'll likely be much easier to do the former. (I can't recall how much of the internals make use of integer properties.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: