Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Curating Bioarchive publications #2722

Open
ValWood opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Curating Bioarchive publications #2722

ValWood opened this issue Apr 6, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Member

ValWood commented Apr 6, 2023

I just spotted that some of the PMID publication in Canto are actually in Bioarchive, so

  1. Do we want authors to be able to curate pubs when in BioArchive (I think yes, if they want to- pre publication curation is good)
  2. BUT if so we need a way to migrate the annotation on a session to the eventual published version (A differnet PMID)

to discuss
@kimrutherford
@manulera

Also, I wondered if any of the sessions I have sent out already are BioArchive (Kim could you check Bioarchive pubs and their status with a query)

@kimrutherford
Copy link
Member

BUT if so we need a way to migrate the annotation on a session to the eventual published version (A differnet PMID)

I'm hoping the PubMed ID for the bioRxiv version will be included in the XML metadata for the published version. If so hopefully we can automate the migration.

Kim could you check Bioarchive pubs and their status with a query

There are 12. Of those 3 have been sent to curators:

pmid title citation publication_date name session_sent_date
PMID:34845452 Genome-wide characterization of SARS-CoV-2 cytopathogenic proteins in the search of antiviral targets. bioRxiv 2021 Dec 14; 2021 12 14 Wrong organism
PMID:36747616 Anillin Related Mid1 as an Adaptive and Multimodal Contractile Ring Anchoring Protein: A Simulation Study. bioRxiv 2023 Jan 27; 2023 01 27 Modelling
PMID:36778333 Microtubule competition and cell growth recenter the nucleus after anaphase in fission yeast. bioRxiv 2023 Feb 01; 2023 02 01 Curatable
PMID:36798368 Quantifying yeast microtubules and spindles using the Toolkit for Automated Microtubule Tracking (TAMiT). bioRxiv 2023 Feb 08; 2023 02 08 Method or reagent
PMID:36909652 Actin-microtubule crosstalk imparts stiffness to the contractile ring in fission yeast. bioRxiv 2023 Mar 02; 2023 03 02 Curatable
PMID:36945633 H3K9 methylation enhances HP1-associated epigenetic silencing complex assembly and suppresses off-chromatin binding. bioRxiv 2023 Mar 08; 2023 03 08 Curatable 2023-04-10 08:45:40
PMID:36945624 Comprehensive mutational analysis of the checkpoint signaling function of Rpa1/Ssb1 in fission yeast. bioRxiv 2023 Mar 06; 2023 03 06 Curatable 2023-04-01 10:19:48
PMID:36945401 The minimal intrinsic stochasticity of constitutively expressed eukaryotic genes is sub-Poissonian. bioRxiv 2023 Mar 08; 2023 03 08 Cell composition or WT feature
PMID:36993237 The fission yeast cytokinetic ring component Fic1 promotes septum formation. bioRxiv 2023 Mar 14; 2023 03 14 Curatable 2023-04-01 09:15:33

@kimrutherford kimrutherford self-assigned this May 5, 2023
@kimrutherford
Copy link
Member

I'm hoping the PubMed ID for the bioRxiv version will be included in the XML metadata for the published version.

I had a look at this one:

PMID:34845452 Genome-wide characterization of SARS-CoV-2 cytopathogenic proteins in the search of antiviral targets. bioRxiv 2021 Dec 14; 2021 12 14 Wrong organism

It's "Wrong organism" but it's now published.

This is the record for the pre-print:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34845452/

And here is the publication:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35164548/

I downloaded the XML for the published version. It does include the PMID of the pre-print but not in a very obvious way. It's in this section:

      <CommentsCorrectionsList>
        <CommentsCorrections RefType="UpdateOf">
          <RefSource>bioRxiv. 2021 Dec 14;:</RefSource>
          <PMID Version="1">34845452</PMID>
        </CommentsCorrections>
      </CommentsCorrectionsList>

So far there aren't that many pombe pre-prints in PubMed so maybe an automated system for updating the PMIDs isn't worth it yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants