Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show low frequency when recording rosbag or echoing /ouster/points topic & Artifact of ROS driver #322

Open
SangHunHan92 opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@SangHunHan92
Copy link

SangHunHan92 commented Apr 17, 2024

1. Show low frequency when recording rosbag or echoing /ouster/points topic with ROS2 galactic driver
When I launch ouster driver with ros2 launch ouster_ros driver.launch.py, lidar pointcloud showing with rviz2 shows a sufficiently high frequency (probably 20hz) [Fig 1].
1

However, if I record or echo /ouster/points topic, lidar frequency is significantly slower. [Fig 2]
When I stopped record or echo, the original frequency is restored.
2

Surprisingly, ROS noetic driver doesn't have this problem at all. Both record and echo work well at 20hz.

During this process, I checked the data transfer amount with iftop, but there was no change. (Constant at about 60Mb)
Changing resolution of the pointcloud also doesn't work: even the lowest 512x10 doesn't solve the issue.
What's the solution for ROS2 galactic?

2. Show Artifact when running ROS driver
When I launch ouster driver, lidar pointcloud in rviz show line artifact [Fig 3]. This issue shows either ROS and ROS2 driver.

3
3-2
(Examples of ROS noetic)

3-4
(Example of ROS2 galactic)

But, this artifact doesn't show in OusterStudio [Fig 4].
4-2

Platform (please complete the following information):

  • Ouster Sensor? OS-1-32-U
  • Ouster Firmware Version? 2.5
  • ROS version/distro? ros2 galactic, ros noetic
  • Operating System? Linux ubuntu 20.04 focal
  • Machine Architecture? amd64
  • git commit hash (if not the latest).
@SangHunHan92 SangHunHan92 added the question Further information is requested label Apr 17, 2024
@andre-nguyen
Copy link

Is this possibly the same issue as #240 and #272 ? Have you tried #302 or #320 ?

@Samahu
Copy link
Contributor

Samahu commented Apr 17, 2024

@SangHunHan92 what @andre-nguyen said, most likely it is the same problem. For ROS[noetic] if you can pull #319 and see if that helps your situation or wait till it gets merged.

@Samahu
Copy link
Contributor

Samahu commented Apr 17, 2024

I just noticed that you mentioned you were under ROS[galactic] so the PR that @andre-nguyen referenced is the right one

@Samahu Samahu self-assigned this Apr 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants