Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check full backwards compatibility with libotr #32

Open
3 tasks
yakiradixon opened this issue Jul 26, 2017 · 4 comments
Open
3 tasks

Check full backwards compatibility with libotr #32

yakiradixon opened this issue Jul 26, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
API architecture importance high An issue that is absolutely necessary to have done before final release
Milestone

Comments

@yakiradixon
Copy link

yakiradixon commented Jul 26, 2017

Why

The library should be backwards compatible with libotr.

References

See otrv4/otrv4#48

Tasks

  • Check what is missing from libotr to be "fully" compatible.
  • Check that all callbacks are working.
  • Check that everything from the bottom list is covered.

Open questions

None.

@claucece claucece changed the title Backwards compatibility with libotr Check full backwards compatibility with libotr Nov 11, 2017
@claucece claucece added this to the Working prototype milestone Nov 18, 2017
@claucece claucece self-assigned this Dec 13, 2017
@claucece
Copy link
Member

claucece commented Dec 14, 2017

To check:

  • Meta instance tags
  • Fragmentation
  • Context
  • Resend messages by time: lastsent,lastrec
  • OTR offer
  • Check OtrlSessionIdHalf for ssid
  • Old mac keys on context_priv
  • Other error codes from otrv3
  • Logged in
  • Disconnect all instances
  • otrl_message_poll_get_default_interval
  • privkey.h
  • tlv.h
  • version.h and m4
  • possibly: What about policies to be used by plugins? #14
  • priv, fingerprints from libotr3

claucece added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2017
claucece added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2017
claucece added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2017
@claucece
Copy link
Member

claucece commented Feb 2, 2018

Also check:

  • fingerprint_seen_otr3 seems a bit shortsighted. maybe we should just give a "version" argument to fingerprint_seen instead?
  • Implement or check most of the otrv4_client_callbacks_ functions

@olabini
Copy link
Contributor

olabini commented Apr 9, 2018

When it says backwards compatible, it doesn't actually mean backwards compatible - it means all the functionality should still work and be available, but not with the same API.

@claucece claucece removed this from the Working prototype milestone Apr 10, 2018
@claucece claucece added API importance high An issue that is absolutely necessary to have done before final release and removed OTRv4 basics waiting labels Jun 26, 2018
@olabini olabini self-assigned this Sep 22, 2018
@olabini olabini removed their assignment Sep 22, 2018
@olabini
Copy link
Contributor

olabini commented Mar 9, 2019

After discussion about this, most of this is probably done - although we need to make sure the otr3 callbacks work correctly.

@claucece claucece added this to the architecture milestone Oct 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API architecture importance high An issue that is absolutely necessary to have done before final release
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants