A Cosmology Group
Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
|
I'm not sure which of the three approaches is right.more research is needed on the topic |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thats the latest information we have.We need more refinement in gravity field changes research |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
More on Assis's work https://johnplaice.substack.com/p/english-translations-of-coulomb-ampere Weber's formula (a classic 1/r^2 term with a velocity-dependent term and an acceleration-dependent term) is probably exactly accurate for force on matter. It also might enable total understanding of the nucleus (how like charges attract at very very small distance). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I looked at the article you have mentioned, and i feel the action at a distance concept should be investigated and studied. Assis's works are worth investigating |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Great. The phrase "action at a distance" seems to make people lose their minds, so maybe call it "action between all distances" or "the force relation between all things in the volume". |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Action between all distances or the the force relation betwwen all things is a more explainable term |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Does ACG think gravity field changes are instant or retarded or advanced?
Prior discussion
https://github.com/orgs/a-cosmology-group/discussions/82#discussioncomment-7129869
An article from Andre Assis on the subject
https://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~assis/Action-at-a-Distance-p45-56(1999).pdf
5 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions