-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Target selection by ontology #7
Comments
This would be an issue relating to the ConceptWiki API lookup and could perhaps be a feature enhancement to this. I am reassigning this issue to Kees fto get his comment. |
I think this is more a question of data in the cache. Essentially we need to be able to build and navigate protein taxonomies, so i think this is more a get the data, write the query, write the widget issue |
It would be cool if we had data on target taxonomies in the LDC such that we could do a target broswing tool like they have on ChEMBL. Doing the tree and the pie chart stuff is very easy in ExtJS and something we would need. Can we get the target ontology/taxonomy used by ChEMBL? |
There are two answers to this! Firstly, there is a new working group on target ontology that is led by christine which will look to addressing exactly this. The idea to create a full ontology by merging different EFPIA lists. But this will take a long time to deliver. In any case, the functionality we build should be generic. Any tree which has proteins as leaves should be able to be loaded up in the same widget "browse proteins by tree X". So, developing against the GO tree would be the same code as the chembl tree, just a different query. I do like the idea of using the chembl tree BUT i am not sure if its in the RDF we have. We need to check if that data has been RDFised, if not then we cant do this and should choose GO. |
At the TTF the manchester group agreed to look into this, a series of areas to consider:
|
Oh, and 4. decide which order we can do these 2 examples, GO or chembl tree first (or both together) |
[USC Feedback]
while target ontology is not yet available should be able to pick by any ontology, can prototype using GO?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: