You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
join the Zulip stream for the topic you will be working on for the rest of the summer: #work & labor, #criminal legal system, #immigration, #health & healthcare, #education
post an introductory message on the stream and describe:
what your personal reach and stretch goals are in understanding this topic
thoughts on how feasible the community organizations' goals are in the below documents
links to any datasets you are curious to analyze and might need help on
potential people you might email to ask for a 15-30 minute chat to help you understand nuances around the research questions
Ask Jaan and/or your team leads if you are having trouble searching for people like this. This skill of identifying stakeholders with whom to conduct informational interviews is crucial for data thinking, and understanding edges of maps, nuances of data, and incentives behind its collection, curation, and the incentives of the community organizations. Consider asymmetric information you might be privy to in these interviews, and organizations that have the most mindshare in the area you are working in, and consider reaching out to them first.
Draft a 3-sentence email to someone you identified could be worth chatting with using the following template: context, question, schedule.
Context sentence: describe who you are, what you are doing, and your motivation for helping the community organization with their reserach question. Question: a specific yes/no question that is easy to decline for the recipient [notice how this implicitly uses the principles of "once upon" in the readings of providing options to enhance agency]. Schedule: describe your specific availability in the next week or two. Post these three sentences in the Zulip stream with your team and decide if it is worth sending, or ask Jaan for feedback directly.
Write a short journal entry somewhere private about what percentile you believe you are at given your awareness of what degree the community organization is or is not aware of best practices surrounding data, data analysis, whether you believe you can help them, what support you believe you might need in achieving your goals for the summer.
Feel free to append to this journal entry throughout the summer to reflect on it. More often than not, you might find that you are the expert in the room and called to rely on your instinct, judgment, knowledge, and skills in asking for help and leaning on a variety of resources in helping yourself, your team, and your community organization make sense of complex data surrounded by a plethora of incentives no one understands in much detail. Paying attention to your experience navigating your confidence as you practice asking for help and feeling entitled in doing so can help.
Pick a service, place, thing, entity you interact with regularly, and find the paths through which it may or may not be amenable to input/feedback. If you can't find this, find the legal person responsible (property: manager or parent management company; company: executive-level person; service: help line/number/email). Prioritize your issues with this service. Then ask GPT to help you understand the incentives of the system you are interacting with, and to help phrase your feedback into a few short sentences hinting that you understand these incentives, and ideally ending with a yes/no question. Submit this feedback, paying attention to your experience and perceived locus of control (does doing this and advocated for yourself and other users feel useful or futile to notice sharp or blurry edges of the map? Legible or illegible systems? Do you believe this 'data' is an accurate reflection of your experience, or does the submission mechanism make it less so?).
Consider how ethnographic research, surveys, qualitative data relies on interpersonal skills like this, and how much data and data analysis depend on things like trust, rapport, empathy among different stakeholders. Might you practice some of these skills in an informational interview related to your work with the community organization your team is working with?
Get a sense of what doctors care about when defining a research question or disease for an active area such as studying the long term sequelae of coronavirus disease. Where are the edges of the maps? What do we know about them, and might there even be any data to be found?
Consider how you can use the same tools we have been learning (GPT, visualization, data analysis) to use storytelling, narrative devices, data to your advantage in telling stories that matter to you beyond this summer.
Reflect on the above readings about what data can and can't capture, how emotions can be considered data we all receive and perceive, and how many decisions that may seem to be influenced by data might just be the result of a small number of people making decisions based on emotions
Watch the guest data thinking lecture on visualization and style guides that are worth using with your community organization and the altair visualization library we have been using -- such as having a title for every visualization that tells a story, and a subtitle that gives more detail: https://panopto.ut.ee/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=1b8a6e6c-3188-44ab-a9cb-afcd00592b44
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do
#work & labor
,#criminal legal system
,#immigration
,#health & healthcare
,#education
Read
Watch
altair
visualization library we have been using -- such as having a title for every visualization that tells a story, and a subtitle that gives more detail: https://panopto.ut.ee/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=1b8a6e6c-3188-44ab-a9cb-afcd00592b44The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: