🙏 Missing licences > CC BY-ND 4.0, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0,CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

[adriens]

❔ Context

I'm currently working on an open data project in New-Caledonia and I need to get some proper licences data.
I found your site very helpful but I'm missing the following ones :

• CC BY-ND 4.0
• CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
• CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

🎫 Related issues

• Faire le lien des licences avec okfn/licenses adriens/odata-data-gouv-nc#7

[rufuspollock]

@adriens good point - would you be up for opening a pull request to fix that?

[adriens]

Yup, I could, is the only thing to do is to manually feed the licenses.csv ?

[rufuspollock]

@adriens you actually just create them as json files in https://github.com/okfn/licenses/tree/master/licenses see e.g. https://github.com/okfn/licenses/blob/master/licenses/CC-BY-4.0.json

Note the NC licenses are all not open (that's why they weren't in here before) -- see e.g. https://blog.okfn.org/2010/06/24/why-share-alike-licenses-are-open-but-non-commercial-ones-arent/ and https://blog.okfn.org/2012/10/04/making-a-real-commons-creative-commons-should-drop-the-non-commercial-and-no-derivatives-licenses/

So if you add them you need to make sure you have "od_conformance": "rejected" -- see e.g. https://github.com/okfn/licenses/blob/master/licenses/ukclickusepsi.json

[adriens]

I have created three distincts PRs for an easier review process 🤞

• Add CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 #98
• Add CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 #97
• Add CC BY-ND 4.0 #96

[rufuspollock]

@adriens thanks!

@mlinksva @Stephen-Gates @ldodds @jwyg @hlainchb would love your thoughts and comments here before merging. I think it makes sense to have these in if properly flagged as "not open".

[hlainchb]

I think it makes sense.

…

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023, 22:35 Rufus Pollock ***@***.***> wrote: @adriens <https://github.com/adriens> thanks! @mlinksva <https://github.com/mlinksva> @Stephen-Gates <https://github.com/Stephen-Gates> @ldodds <https://github.com/ldodds> @jwyg <https://github.com/jwyg> would love your thoughts and comments here before merging. I think it makes sense to have these in if properly flagged as "not open". — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#95 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABGIPYXFQQ5VVAU7BYOYRTW47UBRANCNFSM6AAAAAAV2HEWLU> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Stephen-Gates]

Agreed

[adriens]

😸 🤞

[ldodds]

Makes sense to me.

[adriens]

👐

[rufuspollock]

FIXED. Have merged the PRs for this. 👍

[adriens]

so.... we are all good ❔ 🤩

[adriens]

Looks like I cannot find them on the csv 🙏 😅

[adriens]

[adriens]

[adriens]

[mlinksva]

@adriens the CSV file is generated by a script. Fixed various small issues (and one largish--ND is not OD conformant) with the added licenses, ported the script to python 3, ran the script in #100

[adriens]

Yup, now everything works out of the box, check this

select * from 
read_csv_auto('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/okfn/licenses/master/licenses.csv')
where
    id like 'CC-BY-ND%' or
    id like 'CC-BY-NC%';