Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inefficient peekch() and lookahead() #3

Open
dsamarin opened this issue Oct 7, 2011 · 0 comments
Open

Inefficient peekch() and lookahead() #3

dsamarin opened this issue Oct 7, 2011 · 0 comments
Labels
Low priority Tokenizer

Comments

@dsamarin
Copy link
Member

dsamarin commented Oct 7, 2011

The save() and restore() method of keeping track of the cursor is very inefficient. It may be best to implement unget-type functions. In the end the tokenizer might have to be re-thought out to be more efficient, but this is low priority.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Low priority Tokenizer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dsamarin