-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BG taxonomy class level terms to add/map #2626
Comments
Some redundancy with #26 - although this refers to an earlier version of the taxonomy. Note - as the latest BG taxonomy has no MSN, no D1 or D2, CL becomes the source for definition, description of these general classes. I suspect there are more like this and that they are a good place for CL to add value. |
In light of this consensus data, a few adjustments need to be carried out in the cell ontology to incorporate new terms. New Terms Requests on the CL ontology (more to add but these are the ones that can be added relatively straight away)
Discussion find a CL term that generally refers to immune cells, one that generally refers to OPC-Oligodendrocyte cells and one that refers to Vascular cells |
The CL term that generally refers to immune cells is 'leukocyte' CL:0000738, which already includes 'immune cell' as a related synonym. 'leukocyte' is the ancestor to all major immune cell types, i.e. lymphocytes (T cells, B cells, innate lymphoid cells), dendritic cells, monocytes and macrophages, mast cells, and granulocytes. The reason we haven't made 'immune cell' an exact synonym is that there are a few cell types of non-hematopoietic lineages that play significant roles in the functioning of the immune system, such as follicular dendritic cells (which are not at all like the other dendritic cells), the endothelial cells of the high endothelial venues and a few others like M cells. These non-hematopoietic "immune" cells are all cells found in very particular anatomical locations, and are thus unlikely to be the cells that are identified as immune cells in any kind of transcriptional analysis. |
@AvolaAmg - do you think we will need superclasses to cover SST CHODL GABA, LAMP5 GABA etc independent of region? |
General issue - Cerebral nuclei in Uberon has no children (subClassOf or part_of). In DHBA it has i.e. it covers the basal ganglion. This fits with the draft taxonomy:
(STR= striatum)
|
so far there I cannot find any literature evidence that specifically focuses on neurons that are specifically in the cerebral nuclei and they are derived from Caudal, Medial and Lateral ganglionic evidence. Additional literature research will be needed from BICAN to define these cell types |
It may be that the evidence for dev origin is entirely from transcriptional similarity. I think best to check with Nelson & Morgan. Can you link related Uberon ticket here? |
Terms to Map/Add for class level BG taxonomy
'STR D1 MSN GABA',Not needed as all MSN are in STRSTR D2 MSN GABA',Not needed as all MSN are in STRAnatomy based on abbreviations in DHBA/HBA:
CN - (DHBA) "cerebral nuclei"; id "DHBA:10331"; "CN"; "http://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=138322603#structure=10331"
SN - (DHBA) "substantia nigra"; "DHBA:12251"; "SN"; "http://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=138322603#structure=12251"
STR - (DHBA) "striatum"; "DHBA:10333"; "STR"; "http://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=138322603#structure=10333"
GP - (DHBA) "globus pallidus"; "DHBA:10342"; "GP"; "http://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=138322603#structure=10342"
TH - (HBA) "thalamus"; "TH"; database_cross_reference "http://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=265297125#structure=4392" (DHBA uses this for "medial division of PPHC (area TH)")
BN - (HBA) "basal nuclei (basal ganglia)"; "DHBA:10332"; "BN"; "http://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=138322603#structure=10332"
BG - (HBA) "basal ganglia"; "BG"; "http://atlas.brain-map.org/atlas?atlas=265297125#structure=4276" (DHBA uses BG to refer to band of Giacomini)
Tasks
Tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: