We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Increase nucleus size was only partly fixed when other CP terms were edited
This term is still defined textually as a quality, but classified as a type of nucleus
Background in this ticket: #572
Poss fixes - look at discussion nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio & usage of "increased nucleus size" - immune cell defs:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Having looked at this some more - the solution is to obsolete the term adding replaced_by to:
id: PATO:0040072 name: high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio
This PATO term should also be substituted for all uses of "increased nucleus size" in CL, e.g.
meyolobast Equivalent to (granulocytopoietic cell and has part some basophilic cytoplasm and has part some increased nucleus size and has part some euchromatin (GO) and lacks_part some azurophil granule (GO))
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixes #2251 obsolete increased nucleus size (#2268)
198f9cd
* Import PATO term and substitute axioms * Obsolete 'increased nuclear size' * URL as IRI
aleixpuigb
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Increase nucleus size was only partly fixed when other CP terms were edited
This term is still defined textually as a quality, but classified as a type of nucleus
Background in this ticket:
#572
Poss fixes - look at discussion nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio & usage of "increased nucleus size" - immune cell defs:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: