-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As a NSF team member, I want research assets to accompany final design deliverables so that I can educate internal teams on design direction and thinking. #256
Comments
Thanks for creating this issue 🎉 I'm currently working on the pros/cons list, and I can share an updated version of the doc later today. |
Deck started here: Pitch deck for Amanda |
Update on the pros/cons list: I've finished the first draft of the pros/cons list (which includes examples of other agencies/governments sharing their principles) and shared it in the NSF partners channel. Link to the doc is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YqSzMBs_jXkHyU_Q3bpXNd4xkZp-tXArxo8pjvgZxFk/edit?usp=sharing |
Update on implementation guidance: Today, I finished a first draft of the implementation guide (which contains scenarios to help shape people's thinking around the principles), and I shared this in the channel with @austinhernandez. After implementing Austin's feedback, I'll share this draft with the NSF team to see what changes they'd like me to make. |
We will deliver: |
Update: I finished v1 of the lightweight implementation guide & shared it in the nsf-partners channel. I'll update said guide with feedback from NSF. |
Per today's sprint planning meeting, we'll continue working on this issue during this sprint. |
User story
As a NSF team member, I want research assets to accompany final design deliverables so that I can educate internal teams on design direction and thinking.
Acceptance criteria
Definition of done
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: