Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

porting from 20.03 to 20.09: The option value users.users' in /nix/store/ihx06ak2767z80ri7i5wamiacnd16asp-source/nixos/modules/services/mail/rspamd.nix' is not of type `attribute set of submodules' #83

Open
qknight opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@qknight
Copy link
Member

qknight commented Dec 4, 2023

Evaluating nixpkgs 20.09 on top of nixcloud-webservices branch 20.09 results in:

while evaluating 'flip' at /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/lib/trivial.nix:138:16, called from /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/nixos/modules/services/networking/ssh/sshd.nix:69:33:
while evaluating 'filterAttrs' at /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/lib/attrsets.nix:124:23, called from /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/lib/trivial.nix:138:19:
while evaluating the attribute 'users.users' at undefined position:
while evaluating 'g' at /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/lib/attrsets.nix:276:19, called from undefined position:
while evaluating anonymous function at /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/lib/modules.nix:98:72, called from /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/lib/attrsets.nix:279:20:
while evaluating the attribute 'value' at /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/lib/modules.nix:465:9:
while evaluating the option `users.users':
while evaluating the attribute 'mergedValue' at /etc/nixos/nixpkgs/lib/modules.nix:497:5:
The option value `users.users' in `/nix/store/ihx06ak2767z80ri7i5wamiacnd16asp-source/nixos/modules/services/mail/rspamd.nix' is not of type `attribute set of submodules'.

Related to NixOS/nixpkgs#63103

@qknight
Copy link
Member Author

qknight commented Dec 4, 2023

The source for this is rspamd.nix

And this can all be commented out but we need to patch the configuration then.

  • rspamd bundled ~20.03 2.2
  • rspamd in nixpkgs 20.09 is 2.5
  • rspamd upstream is 3.7.4

@qknight qknight mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2023
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant