You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When running rsp_process on my sample, I encountered the following error:
ValueError: Number of samples, -1, must be non-negative.
This error occurs during the RVT calculation, and I discovered that fr_phase has the same values around the corresponding indexes in _rsp_rvt_harrison
. By applying the following patch to _rsp_rvt_find_min, the error is resolved:
--- a/neurokit2/rsp/rsp_rvt.py
+++ b/neurokit2/rsp/rsp_rvt.py
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ def _rsp_rvt_find_min(increase_inds, fr_phase, smaller_index, silent):
n_min = increase_inds[bigger_n_max]
fr_min = fr_phase[n_min].squeeze()
# Sometime fr_min is the same as n_max and it caused problems
- if fr_phase[smaller_index].squeeze() < fr_min:
+ if fr_phase[smaller_index].squeeze() <= fr_min:
if not silent:
warn(
"rsp_rvt(): The next bigger increasing index has a bigger value than the chosen decreasing index, "
But the code contains the following comment:
# Sometime fr_min is the same as n_max and it caused problems
What specific problems occur when fr_min is the same as n_max?
Should I avoid this calculation if this condition arises, or can the above patch be applied?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When running
rsp_process
on my sample, I encountered the following error:This error occurs during the RVT calculation, and I discovered that
fr_phase
has the same values around the corresponding indexes in _rsp_rvt_harrison. By applying the following patch to _rsp_rvt_find_min, the error is resolved:
But the code contains the following comment:
fr_min
is the same asn_max
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: