You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to be able to use pytorch-lightning 2.0. We switch over to lightning 2.0 as soon as torch 2.0 was released, but would love to be able to try sparseml!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @lminer we currently support torch 2.0 installs with sparseml however the new torch.compile feature is not supported as it does not yet support hooks/modifications after compilation which is the core of what we do to sparsify torch models.
As for lighting support, an official integration is not yet on our roadmap, but if you are interested you should likely be able to integrate sparseml into pytorch lightning callbacks
Hello @lminer
Some time has passed between our last comment and hearing back. I hope the insight @bfineran has proven helpful. I'd like to go ahead and close out this thread. But if you would like to continue the conversation, please re-open this issue. Thank you so much!
Jeannie / Neural Magic
Could we leave it open. I'm guessing that at some point in time you'll add support for lightning 2.0, and it would be nice to have this issue as a record of when the change will be made.
It would be nice to be able to use pytorch-lightning 2.0. We switch over to lightning 2.0 as soon as torch 2.0 was released, but would love to be able to try sparseml!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: