Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Differences in ROI names between neuprint and MANC.surf #45

Open
mmc46 opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Differences in ROI names between neuprint and MANC.surf #45

mmc46 opened this issue May 16, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@mmc46
Copy link
Collaborator

mmc46 commented May 16, 2022

Could the leg neuropils in MANC.surf$RegionList have a name that's more similar to the neuprint ROIs? They seem to be the exception in that the acronym changed from IntNp to LNp. The others just have changes related to brackets or dashes.

library(malevnc)
conn = manc_neuprint()

MANC.surf$RegionList
 [1] "ANm"                 "LNp_T3_R"            "LNp_T3_L"            "mVAC_T3_R"          
 [5] "mVAC_T3_L"           "LNp_T2_R"            "LNp_T2_L"            "HTct_UTct_T3_R"     
 [9] "HTct_UTct_T3_L"      "mVAC_T2_L"           "mVAC_T2_R"           "LTct"               
[13] "IntTct"              "WTct_UTct_T2_R"      "WTct_UTct_T2_L"      "AMNp_R"             
[17] "AMNp_L"              "mVAC_T1_R"           "LNp_T1_R"            "mVAC_T1_L"          
[21] "LNp_T1_L"            "Xnerve_L"            "Xnerve_R"            "NTct_UTct_T1_R"     
[25] "NTct_UTct_T1_L"      "cervical_connective"
neuprint_ROIs()
 [1] "AbN1(L)"          "AbN1(R)"          "AbN2(L)"          "AbN2(R)"          "AbN3(L)"         
 [6] "AbN3(R)"          "AbN4(L)"          "AbN4(R)"          "AbNT"             "ADMN(L)"         
[11] "ADMN(R)"          "AMNp(L)"          "AMNp(R)"          "ANm"              "CV"              
[16] "CvN(L)"           "CvN(R)"           "DMetaN(L)"        "DMetaN(R)"        "DProN(L)"        
[21] "DProN(R)"         "GF(L)"            "GF(R)"            "HTct(UTct-T3)(L)" "HTct(UTct-T3)(R)"
[26] "IntNp(T1)(L)"     "IntNp(T1)(R)"     "IntNp(T2)(L)"     "IntNp(T2)(R)"     "IntNp(T3)(L)"    
[31] "IntNp(T3)(R)"     "IntTct"           "LTct"             "MesoAN(L)"        "MesoAN(R)"       
[36] "MesoLN(L)"        "MesoLN(R)"        "MetaLN(L)"        "MetaLN(R)"        "mVAC(T1)(L)"     
[41] "mVAC(T1)(R)"      "mVAC(T2)(L)"      "mVAC(T2)(R)"      "mVAC(T3)(L)"      "mVAC(T3)(R)"     
[46] "NTct(UTct-T1)(L)" "NTct(UTct-T1)(R)" "PDMN(L)"          "PDMN(R)"          "ProAN(L)"        
[51] "ProAN(R)"         "ProLN(L)"         "ProLN(R)"         "VProN(L)"         "VProN(R)"        
[56] "WTct(UTct-T2)(L)" "WTct(UTct-T2)(R)"
@jefferis
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @mmc46. I'm not sure of the origin of these differences, but most likely due to what is visible in the corresponding neuroglancer layer. Could you check? @dokato do you recall?

@mmc46
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mmc46 commented May 21, 2022 via email

@jefferis
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks. Interesting, I wonder if we imported a very early version.

@mmc46 mmc46 mentioned this issue May 25, 2022
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jefferis @mmc46