You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Before changing the default branch to humble, I'd like to get confirmation from other maintainers on whether that will break anything critical (@spuetz@corot ).
The rationale for this change is that it makes the landing of new people on the repo's main page nicer, assuming most of them are interested in using ROS2.
Before changing the default branch to humble, I'd like to get confirmation from other maintainers on whether that will break anything critical (@spuetz@corot ). The rationale for this change is that it makes the landing of new people on the repo's main page nicer, assuming most of them are interested in using ROS2.
I think the default branch should always be master. But if most new developments will be on ROS 2, it makes sense to
rename master as noetic
rename humble as master
But as migration is still wip (costmap server missing), we need to wait to do that
Besides that, I think there are changes in jazzy that break compatibility with costmaps, so future master should work for jazzy, not humble
The humble branch currently tracks the latest move base flex version for ROS2.
I want to tackle the following post migration ToDos:
master
tohumble
humble
humble
), ROS1 readme (master
))The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: