You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When one would try to build (via abs) vim-runtime from extra, yaourt would call package-query like this: package-query -1Sif "%r %n %v %a" vim-runtime
The resulting string is (at the moment on my system): extra vim-runtime 7.3.918-1 x86_64
The second word (space seperated) is then vim-runtime which is taken for $pl_pkgname
So when building vim-runtime from extra yaourt should look for a file /etc/customizepkg.d/vim-runtime
But because it's a split package there is only one PKGBUILD for vim, vim-runtime and gvim.
So to customize THIS pkgbuild one would (check whether this makes sense) need a file for every single package of the split package.
=> Is it better to have customistation for each PKGBUILD or each (binary) package?
fradeve on Arch forums noticed, that split packages (in his case vim) aren't handled the way it should be.
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1242788#p1242788
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: