Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Add tortuosity to built-in metrics #75

Open
tferr opened this issue Nov 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Feature request: Add tortuosity to built-in metrics #75

tferr opened this issue Nov 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request waiting feedback

Comments

@tferr
Copy link
Member

tferr commented Nov 27, 2021

Built-in metrics should include tortuosity. Details here: https://forum.image.sc/t/csv-properties-on-snt/60399?u=tferr

@tferr tferr added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 27, 2021
@imagesc-bot
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.image.sc/t/csv-properties-on-snt/60399/2

@tferr
Copy link
Member Author

tferr commented Nov 28, 2021

Just a though: the simple arc-chord ratio of a path would work for this, but that may not be as informative in 3D as in 2D? @carshadi, thoughts? Should this wait for your N, Mean, SD, refactoring?

@carshadi
Copy link
Member

carshadi commented Nov 29, 2021

If I recall, the reason we didn't include Tortuosity is because we couldn't settle on the definition, as it is not as standardized as L-measure contraction. If using the arc-chord ratio, that would just be the inverse of Contraction.

@tferr
Copy link
Member Author

tferr commented Nov 30, 2021

I remember now. For 2D the arc-chord ratio seems to be the most common metric. The only issue is in 3D where the radio may be too simplistic? We can leave this open, to gather feedback from folks on what is the best measure to be adopted.

@tferr tferr added waiting confirmation More information on the issue is required waiting feedback and removed waiting confirmation More information on the issue is required labels Nov 30, 2021
@imagesc-bot
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.image.sc/t/resources-explaining-tracing-measurements/64576/2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request waiting feedback
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants