You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am currently trying to purchase a pre-built version of Binky from aliexpress (EU sourcing opeions are not available for my country). I have stumbled upon two different versions of the sensor with two drastically different prices: one labeled as "v1.0.4", that seems to match the design in this repo, and a second one labeled as "rev 0.5", which is much cheaper, much more prevailing in the market, but for which there is no actual info.
Taking a closer look at the second one, one can notice that the difference is that the filter IC was replaced by something that looks a lot like a transistor (possibly a 3-pin IC, but I doubt it). They seem to be actively trying to hide it, by not showing the side with components on most photos.
Question: how big of a chance that it would work the same?
I am currently trying to purchase a pre-built version of Binky from aliexpress (EU sourcing opeions are not available for my country). I have stumbled upon two different versions of the sensor with two drastically different prices: one labeled as "v1.0.4", that seems to match the design in this repo, and a second one labeled as "rev 0.5", which is much cheaper, much more prevailing in the market, but for which there is no actual info.
Taking a closer look at the second one, one can notice that the difference is that the filter IC was replaced by something that looks a lot like a transistor (possibly a 3-pin IC, but I doubt it). They seem to be actively trying to hide it, by not showing the side with components on most photos.
Question: how big of a chance that it would work the same?
Here is a sample rev 0.5 link:
https://aliexpress.ru/item/1005006267690351.html
And here is a v1.0.4 for comparison:
https://aliexpress.ru/item/1005006839297860.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: