-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-00.xml
201 lines (187 loc) · 12.6 KB
/
draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-00.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
<!ENTITY RFC6335 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6335.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC4844 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4844.xml">
<!ENTITY RFC5226 SYSTEM "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5226.xml">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<?rfc toc="no"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<rfc category="std" docName="draft-kuehlewind-system-ports-00" ipr="trust200902">
<front>
<title abbrev="Reassignment of System Ports">Reassignment of System Ports to the IESG</title>
<author fullname="Mirja Kühlewind" initials="M." role="editor"
surname="Kühlewind">
<organization>ETH Zurich</organization>
<address>
<email>[email protected]</email>
</address>
</author>
<date year="2017" />
<abstract>
<t>This document reassigns all System Ports to the IESG that have been assigned to individuals prior to the publication of RFC6335.</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<middle>
<section title="Introduction">
<t>RFC 6335 <xref target="RFC6335"/> requires System Ports, also known as the Well Known Ports, in the range from 0 to 1023, to be assigned by the "IETF Review" or "IESG Approval" procedures <xref target="RFC5226"/>. Further, for assignments done through RFCs published via the "IETF Document Stream" <xref target="RFC4844"/>, the Assignee will be the IESG with the IETF Chair as the Contact. Therefore, all System Ports must be assigned to the IESG.</t>
<t>However, ports that were assigned before the publication of RFC 6335, are often assigned to individuals, even if they are part of the System Port range. Besides the fact that System Ports that are widely used by IETF protocols under IETF change control, this is especially problematic if the assignment is or should be changed. The Assignee, can change the assignment without confirmation of the IETF. However, if the IETF process requires a change, including de-assignment, this cannot be done without the agreement of the original Assignee. Furthermore, no procedure is defined to change the assignment in cases where the original Assignee is not reachable or for any other reason not available anymore, </t>
<t>This document instructs IANA to re-assign all currently assigned System Ports in the range from 0 to 1023 to the IESG, thus aligning existing entries in the "Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry" with the current procedures defined in RFC 6335.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="IANA" title="IANA Considerations">
<t>IANA [will re-assign/has reassigned] all System Ports in the port range from 0 to 1023 that are currently assigned in the "Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry" to the IESG <[email protected]> as Assignee and the IETF Chair <[email protected]> as Contact.</t>
<t>IANA should inform the current Assignees by email with the registered email address about this change. However, IANA does not need to take any actions to inform the current Assignee if the provided email address in not valid anymore, or the Assignee is not reachable anymore with the provided email address.</t>
<t>As part of this change IANA [will also update/has further updated] the Reference column with the following reference for the listed ports that have a corresponding published RFC that uses this port number, as well as the Assignment Notes column for historic RFCs:</t>
<texttable align="center">
<ttcol>Service Name</ttcol><ttcol>Port Number</ttcol><ttcol>Transport protocol</ttcol><ttcol>Reference</ttcol><ttcol>Assignment Notes</ttcol>
<c>systat</c><c>11</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC866</c><c></c>
<c>systat</c><c>11</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC866</c><c></c>
<c>qotd</c><c>17</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC865</c><c></c>
<c>qotd</c><c>17</c><c>upd</c><c>RFC865</c><c></c>
<c>msp</c><c>18</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1312</c><c></c>
<c>msp</c><c>18</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1312</c><c></c>
<c>chargen</c><c>19</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC864</c><c></c>
<c>chargen</c><c>19</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC864</c><c></c>
<c>smtp</c><c>25</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC5321</c><c></c>
<c>smtp</c><c>25</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC5321</c><c></c>
<c>time</c><c>37</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC868</c><c></c>
<c>time</c><c>37</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC868</c><c></c>
<c>rap</c><c>38</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1476</c><c></c>
<c>rap</c><c>38</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1476</c><c></c>
<c>rlp</c><c>39</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC887</c><c></c>
<c>rlp</c><c>39</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC887</c><c></c>
<c>nicname</c><c>43</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3912</c><c></c>
<c>nicname</c><c>43</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3912</c><c></c>
<c>tacacs</c><c>49</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1492</c><c></c>
<c>tacacs</c><c>49</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1492</c><c></c>
<c>domain</c><c>53</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1035</c><c></c>
<c>domain</c><c>53</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1035</c><c></c>
<c>whoispp</c><c>63</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1913</c><c></c>
<c>whoispp</c><c>63</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1913</c><c></c>
<c>bootps</c><c>67</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2131</c><c></c>
<c>bootps</c><c>67</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2131</c><c></c>
<c>bootpc</c><c>68</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2131</c><c></c>
<c>bootpc</c><c>68</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2131</c><c></c>
<c>tftp</c><c>69</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1350</c><c></c>
<c>tftp</c><c>69</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1350</c><c></c>
<c>gopher</c><c>70</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1436</c><c></c>
<c>gopher</c><c>70</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1436</c><c></c>
<c>finger</c><c>79</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1288</c><c></c>
<c>finger</c><c>79</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1288</c><c></c>
<c>www-http</c><c>80</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC7230, RFC7540</c><c></c>
<c>www-http</c><c>80</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC7230, RFC7540</c><c></c>
<c>kerberos</c><c>88</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC4120</c><c></c>
<c>kerberos</c><c>88</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC4120</c><c></c>
<c>dixie</c><c>96</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1249</c><c></c>
<c>dixie</c><c>96</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1249</c><c></c>
<c>hostname</c><c>101</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC953</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>hostname</c><c>101</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC953</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>cso</c><c>105</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2378</c><c></c>
<c>cso</c><c>105</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2378</c><c></c>
<c>rtelnet</c><c>107</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC818</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>rtelnet</c><c>107</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC818</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>sunrpc</c><c>111</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1833</c><c></c>
<c>sunrpc</c><c>111</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1833</c><c></c>
<c>auth</c><c>113</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1413</c><c></c>
<c>auth</c><c>113</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1413</c><c></c>
<c>sftp</c><c>115</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC913</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>sftp</c><c>115</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC913</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>cfdptkt</c><c>120</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1235</c><c></c>
<c>cfdptkt</c><c>120</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1235</c><c></c>
<c>pwdgen</c><c>129</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC972</c><c></c>
<c>pwdgen</c><c>129</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC972</c><c></c>
<c>imap</c><c>143</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3501</c><c></c>
<c>imap</c><c>143</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3501</c><c></c>
<c>bftp</c><c>152</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1068</c><c></c>
<c>bftp</c><c>152</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1068</c><c></c>
<c>sgmp</c><c>153</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1028</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>sgmp</c><c>153</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1028</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>snmp</c><c>161</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3430</c><c></c>
<c>snmp</c><c>161</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3417</c><c></c>
<c>snmptrap</c><c>162</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3430</c><c></c>
<c>snmptrap</c><c>162</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3417</c><c></c>
<c>bgp</c><c>179</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC4271</c><c></c>
<c>bgp</c><c>179</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC4271</c><c></c>
<c>irc</c><c>194</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1459</c><c></c><!-- This one is strange, because RFC 1459 defines IRC, but proposes no ports. -->
<c>irc</c><c>194</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1459</c><c></c><!-- This one is strange, because RFC 1459 defines IRC, but proposes no ports. -->
<c>smux</c><c>199</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1227</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>smux</c><c>199</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1227</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>ipx</c><c>213</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1234</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>ipx</c><c>213</c><c>upd</c><c>RFC1234</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>mpp</c><c>218</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1204</c><c></c>
<c>mpp</c><c>218</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1204</c><c></c>
<c>bgmp</c><c>264</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3913</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>bgmp</c><c>264</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3913</c><c>This RFC is historic.</c>
<c>pt-tls</c><c>271</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC6876</c><c></c>
<c>pt-tls</c><c>271</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC6876</c><c></c>
<c>rtsps</c><c>322</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC7826</c><c></c>
<c>rtsps</c><c>322</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC7826</c><c></c>
<c>odmr</c><c>366</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2645</c><c></c>
<c>odmr</c><c>366</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2645</c><c></c>
<c>aurp</c><c>387</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1504</c><c></c>
<c>aurp</c><c>387</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1504</c><c></c>
<c>ldap</c><c>389</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC4516</c><c></c>
<c>ldap</c><c>389</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC4516</c><c></c>
<c>svrloc</c><c>427</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2608</c><c></c>
<c>svrloc</c><c>427</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2608</c><c></c>
<c>https</c><c>443</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC7230, RFC7540</c><c></c>
<c>https</c><c>443</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC7230, RFC7540</c><c></c>
<c>kpasswd</c><c>464</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3244</c><c></c>
<c>kpasswd</c><c>464</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3244</c><c></c>
<c>photuris</c><c>468</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2522</c><c></c>
<c>photuris</c><c>468</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2522</c><c></c>
<c>isakmp</c><c>500</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC7296</c><c></c>
<c>isakmp</c><c>500</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC7296</c><c></c>
<c>syslog</c><c>514</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC5426</c><c></c>
<c>syslog</c><c>514</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC5426</c><c></c>
<c>printer</c><c>515</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1179</c><c></c>
<c>printer</c><c>515</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC1179</c><c></c>
<c>router</c><c>520</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2453</c><c></c>
<c>router</c><c>520</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2453</c><c></c>
<c>ripng</c><c>521</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2080</c><c></c>
<c>ripng</c><c>521</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2080</c><c></c>
<c>rtsp</c><c>554</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC7826</c><c></c>
<c>rtsp</c><c>554</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC7826</c><c></c>
<c>vemmi</c><c>575</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2122</c><c></c>
<c>vemmi</c><c>575</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2122</c><c></c>
<c>ipp</c><c>631</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC8010</c><c></c>
<c>ipp</c><c>631</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC8010</c><c></c>
<c>msdp</c><c>639</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3618</c><c></c>
<c>msdp</c><c>639</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3618</c><c></c>
<c>ldp</c><c>646</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3036</c><c></c>
<c>ldp</c><c>646</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3036</c><c></c>
<c>rrp</c><c>648</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2832</c><c></c>
<c>rrp</c><c>648</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2832</c><c></c>
<c>aodv</c><c>654</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3561</c><c></c>
<c>aodv</c><c>654</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3561</c><c></c>
<c>acap</c><c>674</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2244</c><c></c>
<c>acap</c><c>674</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2244</c><c></c>
<c>olsr</c><c>698</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC3626</c><c></c>
<c>olsr</c><c>698</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC3626</c><c></c>
<c>agentx</c><c>705</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC2741</c><c></c>
<c>agentx</c><c>705</c><c>udp</c><c>RFC2741</c><c></c>
</texttable>
<t>As part of this maintainance effort, IANA [will further added/has further added] the following entry with the IESG as Assignee and the IETF chair as Contact:</t>
<texttable align="center">
<ttcol>Service Name</ttcol><ttcol>Port Number</ttcol><ttcol>Transport protocol</ttcol><ttcol>Reference</ttcol>
<c>rmt</c><c>411</c><c>tcp</c><c>RFC1202</c>
</texttable>
</section>
<section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
<t>[RFC-Editor please remove this section before publication.]</t>
<t>This draft has no security consideration.</t>
</section>
</middle>
<back>
<references title="Normative References">
&RFC6335;
</references>
<references title="Informative References">
&RFC4844;
&RFC5226;
</references>
</back>
</rfc>