different alignment result between 10x-sc-xcr-vdj and 10x-vdj-bcr-full-length presets #1314
-
I ran the same data with mixcr 4.1.2 and 4.4.2. However, I got huge different result.In 4.1.2,the alignment report is:
however,when I put the same data to 4.4.2,the report is :
I don't know what happened.Can anyone help me? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
-
Hi, can you please share the exact commands that you used for both versions? Also, can you tell me more about the data you are using? The fastq files seem to have been modified, judging by the filenames. Sincerely, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
4.1.2: 4.4.2: YES,I used modified fastq files, I indexed the reads names. The cell barcode is modified so the read length of R2 is 157bp,longer than 150. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Anther question,what is the exact option of --reset-whitelist in 4.2.0? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Did you happen to reverse complement the R2 reads? By default, 10x R2 reads are reversed, and the preset is optimized for this orientation to speed up the analysis. This optimization was added with a recent update. MiXCR v4.1.2 didn't have the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Did you happen to reverse complement the R2 reads? By default, 10x R2 reads are reversed, and the preset is optimized for this orientation to speed up the analysis. This optimization was added with a recent update.
Try adding the following parameter:
-Malign.parameters.readsLayout=Opposite
MiXCR v4.1.2 didn't have the
--reset-whitelist
parameter.