-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show context for references #118
Comments
The problem with searching 13 is two-fold. First, you'll get false positives when searching (for example, all references with the year 2013). Second, 13 isn't printing since its inside the range of cited numbers. For this second issue, I'd like to turn off using dashes for sequential range of numbers. Dashes make sense for print media only, where the modicum of space saving is worth it because there are no downsides. However, the downside of dashed numeric citation sequences in digital media is higher:
Therefore, I think the first course of action should be to try to disable dashed ranges of citations in the default Manubot citation style. Regarding the reference-to-citation lookup, eLife Lens has a nice interface for this (example). Each reference has a "Focus" button which highlights the location of the citations. Also you also can click a citation to highlight all other citations to the same references. Therefore, are we able to export to JATS (see #82) and integrate Lens, we can piggy-pack on this already implemented solution. It looks like pandoc doesn't have a way to link references back to individual citations (as per this discussion), like you would see on wikipedia. |
Disabling dashed ranges of citations would be an improvement. It eliminates false negatives. False positives are tolerable because one can search I also like tooltips but haven't considered the technical requirements. |
Manubot now supports this functionality |
Building on @dhimmel's post on author versus numeric citation styles, another advantage of author-based citations in the current version of Manubot is that it is easier to find where a reference is cited. I can search for
Pantcheva, 2018
more easily than13
, for instance, especially if13
is cited as12-14
or appears in numeric parts of the text.A nice feature for numeric citations might a form of "show context" that some journals use. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12989#references is an arbitrary example. The context consists of snippets of the manuscript where the reference was used plus links back to those locations.
This would also give us one way to address #117. We could assert that the reference number is an increasing function of the reference's first context.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: