Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[manuf] provision owner configuration block during personalization #22266

Closed
2 tasks
timothytrippel opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #25258
Closed
2 tasks

[manuf] provision owner configuration block during personalization #22266

timothytrippel opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #25258
Assignees
Labels
Manufacturing Issues related to manufacturing tasks (hw or sw) Type:Task Tasks, to-do list.

Comments

@timothytrippel
Copy link
Contributor

Description

When the chip is personalized, an owner configuration block may be provisioned so that a post-provisioning ownership transfer process does not need to be run on each device. Integrating this into the personalization flow will entail:

  • provisioning an owner configuration block into the OwnerSlot0 flash info page, and
  • updating the boot log to indicate the chip is "ownd".
@timothytrippel timothytrippel added Priority:P1 Priority: high Type:Task Tasks, to-do list. Manufacturing Issues related to manufacturing tasks (hw or sw) labels Mar 26, 2024
@timothytrippel timothytrippel added this to the Earlgrey-PROD.ROM milestone Mar 26, 2024
@timothytrippel timothytrippel removed the Priority:P1 Priority: high label Sep 23, 2024
@timothytrippel timothytrippel self-assigned this Nov 7, 2024
@cfrantz
Copy link
Contributor

cfrantz commented Nov 20, 2024

#25258

@timothytrippel timothytrippel linked a pull request Nov 20, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Manufacturing Issues related to manufacturing tasks (hw or sw) Type:Task Tasks, to-do list.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants