You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As solids often only take up a fraction of the domain space, index-lists, i.e., sparse matrix representations, should free up a lot of memory and allow the IBB implementation to work better
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this also works for other (solid) boundaries. Especially Halfway Bounce Back also increases speed and reduces memory consumption by using batch-indices ("index-lists"). I'm thinking about replacing all boundary-masks with batch-indices of node coordinates or node-populations coordinates depending on domain-dimensions... or we could even make this adaptive, count the number of affected nodes or population, calculate it's sparse-storage requirements (with batch-indices) and compare it to a full mask.
As solids often only take up a fraction of the domain space, index-lists, i.e., sparse matrix representations, should free up a lot of memory and allow the IBB implementation to work better
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: