-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Support For Yaml Bool #40
Open
caleberi
wants to merge
7
commits into
kubkon:main
Choose a base branch
from
caleberi:add-support-for-yaml-bool
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
066a003
add boolean field to Value struct
caleberi f67c1f7
update test with bool value for both flat and nested
caleberi dd8858d
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/caleberi/zig-yaml into add-…
caleberi 01b324e
feat: add patch support for yaml 1.1 and 1.2
caleberi 70ebe8e
feat: test support for yaml 1.1 and 1.2 backward compatiblity
caleberi 3dbe5a8
feat: simplify bool check
caleberi 5ec6800
feat: exclude value > 5 from boolean check
caleberi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am no YAML expert but I think we should handle all possible variants for a boolean:
taken from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53648244/specifying-the-string-value-yes-in-yaml#53648738
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I will look into this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kubkon I checked the yaml specification and it seems
y|Y|yes|Yes|YES|n|N|no|No|NO
is a backwards-compatible support but it will be nice to have for this project.I have gone ahead to include it in this PR. Hopefully, it is optimal enough. I was looking for a constant solution but so far this is what I have come up with