You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Today, we make heavy use of IsolatedMacVlan() to create what are effectively very lightweight VMs. In the future we will add more complex versions with multiple interfaces, e.g. a Two-Port MAC Relay (TPMR). While easy to manage in a test's implementation, these objects are not visible in the logical topology. Thus, it is hard for a reader of the test description to get an intuitive sense of what is going on.
It would be better if the logical topology could show the "VMs" as individual nodes, and then infamy would know which of those VM-types it supports.
Additional Information
As an example, let's look at the current topology for the upcoming ospf_bfd test:
In this test, two redundant paths exist between R1 and R2. The "fast" path is connected via the PC, which implements a TPMR. src and dst are effectively two different PCs which will be used to verify the OSPF operation.
If these virtual elements could be separate nodes in the topology, the intent would be much clearer:
Internally, infamy would pretty much mangle the second topology to look like the first one, and use that to map to the physical topology.
The corresponding nodes could be created and returned on-demand using env.xlate()
General Information
Anyone can help out by sponsoring development of new features or contributing pull requests.
Please use this issue for discussions related to the feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Today, we make heavy use of
IsolatedMacVlan()
to create what are effectively very lightweight VMs. In the future we will add more complex versions with multiple interfaces, e.g. a Two-Port MAC Relay (TPMR). While easy to manage in a test's implementation, these objects are not visible in the logical topology. Thus, it is hard for a reader of the test description to get an intuitive sense of what is going on.It would be better if the logical topology could show the "VMs" as individual nodes, and then
infamy
would know which of those VM-types it supports.Additional Information
As an example, let's look at the current topology for the upcoming
ospf_bfd
test:In this test, two redundant paths exist between R1 and R2. The "fast" path is connected via the PC, which implements a TPMR.
src
anddst
are effectively two different PCs which will be used to verify the OSPF operation.If these virtual elements could be separate nodes in the topology, the intent would be much clearer:
Internally,
infamy
would pretty much mangle the second topology to look like the first one, and use that to map to the physical topology.The corresponding nodes could be created and returned on-demand using
env.xlate()
General Information
Anyone can help out by sponsoring development of new features or contributing pull requests.
Please use this issue for discussions related to the feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: