Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request for more detailed comments fields. #18

Open
rossc719g opened this issue Jun 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Feature request for more detailed comments fields. #18

rossc719g opened this issue Jun 11, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@rossc719g
Copy link

rossc719g commented Jun 11, 2020

For example.. I just used this tool to import the "Non-crossed" list.
All of the comments fields are the same "Firebog | Non-crossed".
It would be nice if the ones which are also in the "Ticked" list showed as "Firebog | Ticked" instead, so I can tell them apart.

I'm just thinking that if I ever have an issue and need to whitelist, it will be useful to know if the list containing the site I am working on is Ticked or Non-Crossed.

I think I can probably get what I want by deleting them, and then re-running the tool twice. Once to add the Ticked list, and then again to add the Non-crossed list. (I'll give that a try next).

@jessedp
Copy link
Owner

jessedp commented Jun 11, 2020

As is, you can get that to happen by importing them smallest to largest since non-crossed is (always?) a super-set of ticked.

I've been talking to the guy who maintains the lists about providing slightly different ways to pull the lists, so I'd like to see where that goes before I do something weird (code-wise) like this.

@rossc719g
Copy link
Author

Makes sense.
As you say, I was able to get what I wanted by deleting them, and then re-running the tool twice. Once to add the Ticked list, and then again to add the Non-crossed list.
So, there is nothing urgent about this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants