No need for an explicit dep on Hamcrest

[jglick]

#222 (review) #223 Normally included in all plugins via jenkins-test-harness, and in this case also via awaitility.

[jtnord]

But as it is used it directly it should have an explicit dep and not rely on any transitive dependency.

as such this seems incorrect to me.

[jglick]

as it is used it directly it should have an explicit dep

Perhaps, but the same could be said of 90% of Jenkins plugins, and this is the only one I am familiar with which declares the dep explicitly. (As of your #152, apparently.) Unless you propose to activate the Enforcer rule which would mandate use of explicit dependencies, this seems like a gratuitous inconsistency.

[Vlatombe]

I agree for matter of consistency.