Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is clientjs an idled project? #155

Open
mohaa7 opened this issue Nov 20, 2022 · 8 comments
Open

Is clientjs an idled project? #155

mohaa7 opened this issue Nov 20, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@mohaa7
Copy link

mohaa7 commented Nov 20, 2022

Is it abandoned?

As the code has not been touched for a year, is it recommended to use in production, in terms of bug reports followup?

Will it have any future major release?

@avpaderno
Copy link

If you are looking for a different library, there is the FingerprintJS library, which has an accuracy between 40% and 60%, but it is fully open source.
ClientJS itself has been built upon Valve/fingerprintjs, which then evolved into fingerprintjs/fingerprintjs.

@jackspirou
Copy link
Owner

jackspirou commented Apr 9, 2023

ClientJS is not built on FingerprintJS, but you should def use FingerprintJS! It's professionally maintained, and does provide good accuracy for an open source, client side only product.

@avpaderno
Copy link

avpaderno commented Apr 10, 2023

I apologize: I was "quoting" the project page, which says Built Upon: and shows three links, including  https://web.archive.org/web/20200714191004/https://github.com/Valve/fingerprintjs.

I did not mean this library has code that comes from that library, but that the project page has links to other libraries, which I take it as meaning These are other libraries with a similar purpose. If I were to look to alternatives, I would check those three links.

@acastro2
Copy link

acastro2 commented Aug 2, 2023

https://github.com/fingerprintjs/fingerprintjs just change its license so it can't run in production anymore

@avpaderno
Copy link

3.x and lower versions are still licensed under MIT.

@peter-wd-1
Copy link

3.x and lower versions are still licensed under MIT.

is this true? I can use it on production?

@mohaa7
Copy link
Author

mohaa7 commented Nov 1, 2023

I can use it on production?

Changes are not retroactive. The code in version4 is still readble, but not open source anymore! By version3 you will be stuck on an immobile creature!

@avpaderno
Copy link

avpaderno commented Nov 1, 2023

Yes, Branch 3.x is still licensed under MIT. I guess they will not back-port to branch 3.x the changes they introduce in branch 4.x, though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants