You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have a project where some requirements are implemented via settings recorded in an XML configuration file. OFT currently does not support importing tags from XML files, as documented in the User Guide:
Note that XML is at the moment not yet supported by the Tag Importer, because it would collide with the SpecObj Importer. Once import fallback is implemented, XML will be supported too.
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to be able to add implementation tags to an XML file and have those parsed by OFT when tracing requirements.
It looks like the comment about import fallback was added 3 years ago. Is this something that's still on the radar to implement?
Describe alternatives you've considered
As a workaround, I can document the implementations in a separate Markdown file that references the XML file and add a comment to the XML file that notes that the setting is implementing a requirement. However, this separates the implementation tag from the actual implementation (somewhat needlessly).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @g-psantos, in the current implementation OFT picks the importer by file suffix from a list of supported importers. The first importer to feel responsible for a file suffix wins. This is why currently we try to only support each suffix by only one importer.
So with the current implementation you could trick OFT into using the tag importer by changing the file suffix. I know that this is not very convenient, but we first need to implement a project-central configuration in a separate ticket before being able to override such settings.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have a project where some requirements are implemented via settings recorded in an XML configuration file. OFT currently does not support importing tags from XML files, as documented in the User Guide:
Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to be able to add implementation tags to an XML file and have those parsed by OFT when tracing requirements.
It looks like the comment about import fallback was added 3 years ago. Is this something that's still on the radar to implement?
Describe alternatives you've considered
As a workaround, I can document the implementations in a separate Markdown file that references the XML file and add a comment to the XML file that notes that the setting is implementing a requirement. However, this separates the implementation tag from the actual implementation (somewhat needlessly).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: