Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which version of the VDMA 5050 is implemented #5

Open
gramss opened this issue Oct 26, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

Which version of the VDMA 5050 is implemented #5

gramss opened this issue Oct 26, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@gramss
Copy link

gramss commented Oct 26, 2020

Hey,

can you please specify on which version of the VDAM5050 these messages are based..?

Thank you!

@jabbenseth
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

right now the messages should meet the specifications in V1.0. However the Interface doesn't translate well into the static format of ROS messages.

Updates to V1.1 are welcomed and might be provided by us in the future but are not on highest priority right now.

@ljaniec
Copy link

ljaniec commented Aug 13, 2021

--Any update on the update to V1.1?--
edit: I just saw messages to the newest commits and description.

There is just around the corner next update too, would you comply it too? Q3 2021

@ipa-pfs
Copy link
Contributor

ipa-pfs commented Sep 17, 2021

Yes we will include all the updates in here.
Current state should be V1.1 compatible

@ljaniec
Copy link

ljaniec commented Mar 14, 2022

There is a preview version 2.0.0 of VDA5050: https://github.com/VDA5050/VDA5050/blob/2.0.0-preview/VDA5050_EN_V1.md#version-200-release-candidate-for-review

Will be there a separate branch for it? There are some new messages defined.

@tommy-erko
Copy link

tommy-erko commented Mar 24, 2022

There is a preview version 2.0.0 of VDA5050: https://github.com/VDA5050/VDA5050/blob/2.0.0-preview/VDA5050_EN_V1.md#version-200-release-candidate-for-review

Will be there a separate branch for it? There are some new messages defined.

Actually, version 2 has already been released. @jabbenseth do you plan on adding its implementation (as a branch probably)? It would be very appreciated.

@ipa-pfs
Copy link
Contributor

ipa-pfs commented Apr 22, 2022

We are currently working on it internally and will release it in the upcoming time

@jabbenseth
Copy link
Contributor

Also if you already have a WIP you are working on yourself we gladly accept contributions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants