How to document ADaM & DISC terms #1017
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I think this makes sense! I would add that I think other code-related terms like package & function names should also be quoted. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
One more detail is to make sure to differentiate between an acronym/concept vs a variable/parameter/argument. In reference to the example from @m7pr Similarly, if referring to a statistical method, the name should NOT be code-quoted. However, if the name of the method is to be passed into a function as an argument option, then it should be shown in code-quote format. Consider the following example:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @insightsengineering/nest-core-dev @insightsengineering/nest-sme,
I am creating this discussion to create consistency and eliminate confusion regarding what to quote and what not to quote in package documentation for CDISC-related terms. Additionally, I want to record the decision in case we need to revisit this.
We have already had several discussions on this topic:
The current approach are:
To Quote
ADLB
,ADSL
,DM
, etc)PARAMCD
,AVALC
)Don't quote
Can I please hear everyone's opinion on this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions