You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your incredible contribution! I have a question about understanding the term conditional in your work.
You concatenate the conditional vector in the input of coupling layers since it provides conditional prior. Can I understand it this way: You use conditional vector since your input of the flow part is the output of a pooling layer of a pre-trained CNN, which is impossible to do inverse without using conditional vector. In other words, the conditional vector (your PE) maintains pre-trained CNN's invertibility or makes the inverse more accurate.
If I understand it right, could you please provide some mathematical evidence or some supplementary content to prove this point? If not, how can I understand the conditional vector and positional prior and how does it work?
Thanks for your time.
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for your incredible contribution! I have a question about understanding the term conditional in your work.
You concatenate the conditional vector in the input of coupling layers since it provides conditional prior. Can I understand it this way: You use conditional vector since your input of the flow part is the output of a pooling layer of a pre-trained CNN, which is impossible to do inverse without using conditional vector. In other words, the conditional vector (your PE) maintains pre-trained CNN's invertibility or makes the inverse more accurate.
If I understand it right, could you please provide some mathematical evidence or some supplementary content to prove this point? If not, how can I understand the conditional vector and positional prior and how does it work?
Thanks for your time.
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: