'detection of light stimulus involved in visual perception' should not be SubClassOf 'detection of visible light'

[dosumis]

I think this is wrong and too human centric. Birds and insects with UV photoreceptors perceive images using those receptors. This is visual perception. This is causing problems for CL definition of photoreceptors. See obophenotype/cell-ontology#2253

[dosumis]

There are other superclasses, so it looks like this could just be deleted.

[dosumis]

Ooops - I accidentally did a hot fix to master !! Sorry!!!

I didn't think that was possible on ODK repos. Should probably set github to block.

Anyway - I think minor edit so should be harmless. Would have like to look for any secondary effect though!

[cmungall]

Better ti obsolete the grouping class than have an incomplete one?

…

On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 6:58 AM David Osumi-Sutherland < ***@***.***> wrote: Closed #28657 <#28657> as completed via 68871a3 <68871a3> . — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#28657 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOKYGZKTGMGLF5JEVLTZPOGBJAVCNFSM6AAAAABL4SWTIOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJTG42DEMRWGMZTMOA> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.*** com>

[dosumis]

I don't think any grouping classes need changing. While this does leave a singleton, there is definitely plenty of detection of visible light outside visual perception - e.g. in plants or by clock cells with cryptochromes

[dosumis]

Passes QC at least