-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🧑🌾 Homebrew main, 7 and 6 dartsim test regressions #662
Comments
I believe these regressions are related to the release of dartsim 6.14.2 |
@scpeters Would it be beneficial to set up tests on the dartsim/dart repo to identify any issues with the Gazebo integration? Could someone help create a CI job for this in the dartsim/dart repo? Testing building and running Dart and Gazebo-Physics within a Docker environment would suffice. |
good idea, I'll discuss with the simulation team |
running
here's the full backtrace
|
This bug has been pretty tricky to track down. I tried building dartsim with gz-physics7 in a colcon workspace on macOS, but that didn't reproduce the problem. The only way I can reproduce it is by installing dartsim with The diff from 6.13.2 to 6.14.2 is pretty huge (dartsim/dart@v6.13.2...v6.14.2), and seems to have more changes than are listed in the changelog. To investigate further, I've been using https://github.com/dartsim/dart/blob/v6.14.2/CMakeLists.txt#L80-L88 |
I just confirmed that building the homebrew formula with |
|
Ah, it's my bad. |
Homebrew/homebrew-core#176368 has been merged and gz-physics tests are passing again. I'll go ahead and re-trigger CI for the other branches and mark this as fixed https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/gz_physics-ci-gz-physics7-homebrew-amd64/64/ |
Environment
Description
Steps to reproduce
Output
gz-physics7 was failing to build because of #660. This issue is already fixed. However, we still have multiple test regressions to address
Reference build:
Test regressions:
*COMMON_TEST_added_mass_dartsim.test_ran
Test failures in log output:
See reference builds for complete test output. This is probably happening after #660 fix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: