Update latest changes from Submodule #359
Conversation
Hrishabh17
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
WalkthroughThe update in Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (2)
Line range hint
259-259: Refactor the comparison toFalseto use a more Pythonic expression.- if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved == False + if not Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved
Line range hint
274-274: Refactor the comparison toTrueto use a more Pythonic expression.- if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved == True + if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (2 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Ruff (4)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (4)
155-155: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is None
170-170: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is None
259-259: Avoid equality comparisons to
False; useif not Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved:for false checks
274-274: Avoid equality comparisons to
True; useif Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved:for truth checks
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (1)
Line range hint
66-79: The updated assertions intest_construct_attributes_filtercorrectly reflect the new expected dictionary structure. Ensure that the rest of the application logic aligns with these changes.
|
Hrishabh17
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
Hrishabh17
added
deploy
Hrishabh17
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (2)
Line range hint
259-259: Use idiomatic Python for false checks.- if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved == False + if not Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved
Line range hint
274-274: Use idiomatic Python for truth checks.- if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved == True + if Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- fyle_integrations_imports (1 hunks)
- tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- fyle_integrations_imports
Additional Context Used
Ruff (4)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (4)
155-155: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is None
170-170: Comparison to
Noneshould becond is None
259-259: Avoid equality comparisons to
False; useif not Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved:for false checks
274-274: Avoid equality comparisons to
True; useif Error.objects.get(id=error.id).is_resolved:for truth checks
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/test_fyle_integrations_imports/test_modules/test_base.py (3)
66-66: LGTM! The addition of'active': Truealigns with the new requirements for attribute filtering.
75-75: LGTM! The updated assertion correctly reflects the new filtering logic for 'COST_CENTER'.
79-79: LGTM! The updated assertion correctly reflects the new filtering logic for 'CUSTOMER'.
|
No description provided.